Warning, this is pretty long…
So if you read the comments from the last post, it’s obvious dad has bought into the oil companies’ views on drilling for oil and entrenching ourselves in an old and dirty fuel source. So rather than just let him think he made his points and walked away victorious, let me show why his comments (which were obviously copied from a pro-oil website) don’t respond to my comments.
1) I pointed out that God left us to be stewards of His creation. We should do our best to take care of it as followers of the Lord. It doesn’t take a genius to see that oil and fossil fuel burning is terribly polluting. Living outside of Denver, dad should know this firsthand. The brown cloud produced by fossil fuels is disgusting and bad for people’s health. I don’t think polluting the air of our planet qualifies as being good stewards of God’s creation. No amount of oil propaganda is going to convince me otherwise. I can see it with my own two eyes.
2) The comments talk a lot about thriving caribou and whatever but if you read back over my post, I didn’t talk about the potential harm to caribou or any other animal. I talked about the eyesores oil production facilities are. I talked about how dirty everything related to fossil fuels are. I commented on how oil is a finite resource and not the long-term answer. Trying to draw focus away from the argument is a classic tactic when there’s no response to the argument. If you can’t beat it, hey look over there!
3) Opening up drilling in ANWR or off our coasts will do nothing for the current economy. It will take years before any oil from those areas are put into the system. There’s simply no infrasstructure established right now to make that possible. Roads would have to be built, rigs moved or built, pipelines built and in the case of offshore drilling, oil platforms built and moved into place. None of that is going to happen overnight. We’re stuck with this situation for a while no matter what we do on ANWR. Plus, even with more oil, no new refineries means we’re still not going to have any impact on supply.
4) The arguments the comments make about alternative energy are flawed. The numbers about our future oil needs all assume that our use of alternative fuels and energy sources will remain static and not increase in the coming years. I would assume that as long as we don’t elect another Bush to the White House, that will begin to change, soon. Therefore our “need” for oil will decrease over time. Studies show we’ve got enough wind in the middle sections of the country to power the entire country, at projected growth rates, for the next 50 years. And that’s just wind. Solar has the same potential in the So. Cal/Arizona/Nevada deserts. Area no one uses anyway could be put to use powering our nation. The big hold up here is our electricity grid is seriously old and not capable of transporting electricity over long distances.
My solution to that is to stop spending billions a day in Iraq and start rebuilding our electric grid. It needs to happen.
5) Though alternative fuels like wind and solar are currently on the expensive side, mass production and use would undoubtedly lower prices. This is classic supply/demand economics that Republicans flaunt all the time. The reason these are expensive is because they are used so infrequently. Increase usage and prices will drop. As I stated in my post, not only will this help our environment, lower our dependence on oil and provide jobs, Scandanavian countries show that it will drastically improve our economy. Jobs will be created and money will stay within our economy rather than lining Middle Eastern princes’ pockets.
6) The arguments and numbers about oil/fossil fuels being cost effective is based on oil being at $20-$30/barrel, not the current $130/barrel. Again, flawed argumentation to try to distract you. Remember, my original arguments had nothing to do with cost-effectiveness… it had to do with oil being a bad choice and now with higher prices we finally have the incentive to move to better choices. I even said I was fine with paying higher prices for now if it meant we moved away from oil.
7) The whole global warming debate. They take some shots at the Nobel prize winning group and say they’re not qualified. Fortunately for me I know this is a big crock and an outright lie. See, two of the scientists on the intergovernmental panel that won the award with Al Gore live right here in the Bitterroot Valley. Even better, my newspaper interviewed one of them. We also got his credentials. He’s a highly respected, well published and thoroughly vetted scientist.
I don’t know why people are still arguing global warming exists and poses a pretty big threat to the planet. Heck, even the thick skulled George W. Bush has said it’s a problem we need to address. (Though he’s done way more to contribute to it than help solve it.) If anyone REALLY wants to get into the whole climate change debate, I’ll be happy to do it, but honestly, do some research and I think you’ll find that the majority of legitimate scientists involved in the climate change field will be on my side.
But NONE of that addresses ANY of the reasons I said we shouldn’t drill. Oil is and always will be a DIRTY fuel. There are cleaner, far more sustainable sources of fuel. The technology is relatively new and so it’s not super cheap. If we make the commitment to the change though, economics of scale will lower the price and ultimately we’ll be far better off. Cleaner air and being energy self-sufficient forever is worth the initial investment.
Whether we drill in ANWR or off our coasts, one thing is clear… we’re going to run out of oil at some point. Like I’ve said over and over, it’s a finite resource. Oil consumption is going up around the world and no amount of drilling is going to stop us from running out. Our efforts and money would be better spent developing clean, sustainable energy sources. Drilling will only temporarily distract us from the inevitable. Why not lead the charge instead of letting other countries lead the way? If we don’t do it, the eventual change will only be more expensive for our nation.
Don’t be distracted by oil propaganda. We have to think long-term here and do what will be best for the future of our nation. There’s no avoiding high gas prices for the near future. Let’s start the transition away from oil now. We’ve already waited too long. Let’s not wait any longer.